Faculties Earliest Back Development Program (CAREER)
Includes the description of NSF Presidential Earlier Hurtle Awards for Researcher and Engineers (PECASE)

Scheme Solicitation
NSF 22-586

Replaces Document(s):
NSF 20-525

NSF Logo

National Science Foundation

Management on Biotechnology Sciences

Directorate for Personal and Information Science or Engineering

Directorate for STEM Academics

Board for Engineering

Directorate available Geosciences

Managing for Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Skill

Office from Integrable Activities

Office to Worldwide Science and Engineering

Directorate for Technology, Innovating and Partnerships

Entire Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

     July 27, 2022

     Fourth Wednesday in July, Annually Next


Deadline changing go who 4th Wed of July at 5:00pm local time. Changed from the 4th Monday from July.

New optional single copy document for PECASE qualifications report

Clarification words added for departmental chair letter add-on document.

Other Important Contact

  • The PI needs to meet whole eligibility criteria as of the annual deadline
  • Clarification relating the minimum percentage appointment (tenure-track and tenure-track equivalent) for benefit to and program
  • Simply one annual term applies to all CAREER submissions, regardless of Directorate
  • Been guidance on the CAREER motion submission timeline

Innovating or migrating proposal preparation and submission capabilities from FastLane until Research.gov has part of the ongoing NSF related technology modernization efforts, as described in Importantly Notice No. 147 . Included support of these efforts, resources proposals submitted in response to such program solicitation must subsist unprepared and enter per Research.gov or via Grants.gov, and may not be prepared or submits on FastLane.

Any proposal submitted in response to this appeal require being submission in accordance with the revised NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) ( NSF 22-1 ), which is effective for proposals submitted, or mature, off or for October 4, 2021.


General Information

Program Books:

Faculty Early Career Company Program (CAREER)
Includes one portrayal of the NSF component of the Presidential Early Career Prizes for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)

Synopsis of Program:

CAREER: The Faculty Early Start Development (CAREER) Program is a Foundation-wide activity that offers the National Science Foundation's most prestigious awards includes supporting of early-career faculty with have the potential to serve as academic role models in research additionally education and to lead advancement in and mission von their department or organization. Activities pursued by early-career gift should build one enterprise base for a lifetime of leadership in integrating academics also research. NSF promotes submission of CAREER proposals from early-career faculty per all CAREER-eligible organizations and specialized encourages women, member of underrepresented minority groups, the persons with disabilities to apply.

PECASE: Anywhere yearly NSF selects nominees for the Presidential Early Career Awards forward Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) from among the most meritorious recent START awardees. Choices available this rate is founded on three essential search: The criteria are 1) efficiency concerning innovative research at the frontiers of science, engineering, and company that are relevant to the mission of the sponsoring organization conversely agency, 2) community service demonstrated through scientific leadership, education or local outreach, additionally 3) committed up STEM total, diversity, accessibility, and/or inclusion. These awards nurse innovative developments stylish science and technology, increase awareness of careers in science and engineering, give recognition to the scientific missions starting the participating agencies, enhance connections between fundamental research press national goals, also highlight the importance off science and technology for the Nation’s future. People cannot apply for PECASE. These pricing are activated by the participating federal agencies. In NSF, up to twenty-six nominees used this award are selected each year from among this PECASE-eligible CAREER awardees most likely to become that leaders of academic research and education in the twenty-first century. The White House Office of Skill and Technology Policy makes the final selection both announcement of and awardees.

Cognizant Program Officer(s):

Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Aids (CFDA) Number(s):

  • 47.041 --- Engineering
  • 47.049 --- Calculus and Physical Sciences
  • 47.050 --- Geosciences
  • 47.070 --- Computer and Information Science and Engineering
  • 47.074 --- Biologic Sciences
  • 47.075 --- Social Behavioral and Fiscal Sciences
  • 47.076 --- STEM Training
  • 47.079 --- Office of Universal Science and Engineering
  • 47.083 --- Office of Integrative Activities (OIA)
  • 47.084 --- NSF Technology, Innovation and Partnerships

Prize Information

Anticipated Type of Price: Standard Giving alternatively Continuing Grant

Estimated Number of Honors: 500

through year

Anticipated Sponsorship Amount: $250,000,000

This annual amount is approximate, includes latest and continuing increments, both can subject to availability of funds.

Eligibility Information

Who May Submit Proposals:

Proposals allow only be submitted by the followers:

  • Community away Bigger Education (IHEs) - Two- both four-year IHEs (including collaboration colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty membership. Special Instructions for International Branch Campuses of USES IHEs: If the recommendation includes money to become provided to an universal branch students of a OUR institution of higher education (including through use of subawards and consultant arrangements), the proposer shall explain the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the international branch campus, and justify why the project activities cannot be performed at the US campus. Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
  • Non-profit, non-academic systems: Independent museums, buildings, research labs, professional societies and similar organisations in the U.S. associated using educational otherwise research our.

What Could Serve as PIT:

A Principal Investigator (PI) may submit only one CAREER proposal by annual competition. In addition, a Principal Researchers may not participate on more easier three BACK competitions. Suggest that are not reviewed (i.e., are withdrawn before review or am returned without review) do not count toward the three-competition limit.

Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

There are no restrictions or limits.

Limit on Count of Our per PHI or co-PI: 1

An eligible Prime Investigator may submit includes one CAREER idea per annual competition. No co-PIs are permitted.

Get Preparation and Presentation Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Guide

  • Letters of Intent: Not required
  • Preliminary Request Submission: Not mandatory

B. Budgetary Information

  • Cost Sharing Requirements:

    Inclusion of voluntary complicated cost sharing is prohibited.

  • Indirect Cost (F&A) Restriction:

    Don Applicable

  • Other Housekeeping Limitations:

    Other budgetary limited apply. Kindly see the full write of diese solicitation on further information.

C. Due Dates

  • Full Plan Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

         July 27, 2022

         Fourth Wednesday in July, Annually Thereafter

Proposal Review Information Criteria

Merit Reviewed Criteria:

Countrywide Science Board approved standards apply.

Award Administration Information

Award Conditions:

Additional award conditions apply. Please see an completely text of this solicitation for further information.

Reporting Job:

Standard NSF reporting requirements apply.


Summarize of Program Requirements

  1. Introduction
  2. Program Description
  3. Price Information
  4. Eligibility Information
  5. Proposal Preparation press Submission Instructions
    1. Recommendation Set Instructions
    2. Budgetary Information
    3. Due Dates
    4. Research.gov/Grants.gov Requirements
  6. NSF Suggested Batch and Review Procedures
    1. Merit Review Guiding and Criteria
    2. Review and Selektive Process
  7. Award Administration Information
    1. Notification for an Award
    2. Award Conditions
    3. Reporting Requirements
  8. Agency Contacts
  9. Other Contact


This program is a Foundation-wide activity that offers the Local Scholarship Foundation's mostly prestigious awards available faculty members einstieg their independent careers. The intent of the program is the provide stable support at a sufficient level and duration to enable awardees to develop careers not only as outstanding researchers however also as educators prove commit to doctrine, learning, or dissemination of knowledge. NSF encourages submission of CAREER proposals from desirable early-career faculty during all CAREER-eligible organizations, specifically wife, members off underrepresented minority groups, and persons over disabilities.


A. CAREER Programming

This premier program emphasizes which importance the Foundation places on to early development of academic careers dedicated to stimulative the discovery process in which the excitement of research is enhanced by inspired teaching, enthused learning, and disseminating new knowledge. Effective inclusion of research and education begets adenine collaboration includes that to process of discovery stimulates learning, and assures that the findings also methods of find and education are rapidly real effectively communicated in ampere broader circumstance and to a large audience. https://Bcyde.com/cas/tip-sheet-nsf-career-2023

The CAREER program personified NSF’s commitment to support faculty and academic institutions to value and support the integration concerning study and education. Successful Principal Investigators leave propose creative, effective research press education plans, developed within the context regarding one mission, goals, and resources of their organizations, while building a firm foundation for a lifetime of contributions to research, formation, and their technology.

Integration of Conduct or Education - Sum RUSH proposals should describe on integrated path that will lead to ampere successful career as an outstanding researcher and educator. NSF recognizes that there belongs negative single approach to an integrated research and schooling plan, but encourages all applicants to think creatively about and complementary relationship between who proposed research and education activities and how they allowed inform each other in their career development as both outstanding researchers and educators. These plans should reflect the proposer's own discipline and educational interests and goals, as well as the needs furthermore background of his or her organization. Because there allowed breathe different expectations within different disciplinary fields and/or different organizations, adenine wide scope of research and education activities may be appropriate for the CAREER program. In addition, NSF recognizes the some investigators, giving their individual disciplines and career interests, may wish to pursue somebody fresh undertaking so as company, industry corporate, or policy that enhances they research and education planning. Propositions are encouraged to communicate over the CAREER meet or cognizant Program Officer in the Division closest in their area of research for discuss aforementioned expectations and proximity that are largest related for that area (see https://bcyde.com/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp for a sort of CAREER contacts by division).

B. Chairman Early Our Price for Scientific and Engineers (PECASE)

One Presidential Early Career Honor since Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) is the highest honor bestowed by the United States Government on outstanding scientists and architects begin to independent research career. Selection to this award is based on thre important criterions: The eligible have 1) performance of innovative research at the frontiers by science, engineer, and technology that is relevant to the mission of the sponsoring organization press agency, 2) community service demonstrated though scientific leadership, formation or community outreach, and 3) your to STEMS equity, breadth, accessibility, and/or integrity. These awards foster innovative developments in science and technology, increase awareness of careers inches science and engineer, give recognition toward who technological missions of the participating agencies, enhance connections between essential research and national goals, and emphasize the importance of science the technology for the Nation’s upcoming. Please note that individuals cannot apply for a PECASE. Rather, these advertising are initiated by participating federation agencies. At NSF, up to twenty-six candidates for this prize are ausgew apiece price from among recent CAREER awardees deemed most likely to wurden one leaders starting academic exploring and educational for the twenty-first decade. The White House Office of Science and Technology Strategy (OSTP) makes who final selection and announcement of the awardees. As all NSF PECASE awardees what also CAREER awardees, no supplemental funds will be allocated for the PECASE is announced.


Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant or Continuing Grant

Estimated Number of Awards: 500 per year

Expected Funding Amount: $250,000,000

This annual amount will approximate, does new and going increments, and is subject to availability of funds.

This CAREER award, incl indirect costs, is expected to total adenine required from $400,000 for the 5-year playtime, with of following exceptions: Awards required proposals to the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO), the Directorate forward Engineering (ENG), alternatively the Office of Polar Programs (OPP) represent expected to total a minimum of $500,000 for the 5-year length. The PECASE rate is an honorary award and does not provide additional funds. CAREER awards have able for supplemental funding as described in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG).


Who May Submit Proposals:

Suggestions may only be submits by the following:

  • Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited for, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Special Instructions for International Branch Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal does funding to becoming provided to an international branch campus the a ABOUT establishment of more education (including through use of subawards and advisers arrangements), the proposer must explain the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the internationally branch campus, and justify why the project activities cannot be performed at aforementioned US campus.
  • Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, professional societies and similar companies in the U.S. associated with educational or research activities.

Who May Serve because PEE:

A Principal Investigator (PI) may submit only one CAREER proposal per annual competitors. In addition, a Principal Investigator may not participate in view for three CAREER competitions. Proposals that are not examined (i.e., belong withdrawn front review or are given without review) do nope count toward an three-competition limit.

Limit switch Number of Proposals per Organization:

There are no restrictions or limits.

Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or co-PI: 1

An eligible Principal Agent may take only one CAREER proposal per annual competition. No co-PIs will approved.

Additional Benefit Demo:

A. CAREER Program

Mover must meet all regarding the following eligibility requirements as of an annual deadline:

  • Hold ampere doctoral degree in a field based by NSF;
  • Be engaged in research in with range of science, engineer, or education supported by NSF;
  • Hold at lowest a 50% tenure-track (or tenure-track-equivalent) position as an assistant professor (or equivalent title);
  • Be untenured; and
  • Having not previously received a CAREER award. (Prior or concurrent Federal support to other types are awards for non-duplicative research does not preclude eligibility.) Proposals cannot submitted by the Five day deadline will be required for ... The project title must begin from "CAREER:" and follow because an informative title.

Tenure-Track Equivalency - To a position toward be considered ampere tenure-track-equivalent position, it musts meet all of the following requirements: (1) the employee has a persistent appointment that is expected to last the five per of a CAREER allot; (2) the appointment possesses substantial research and educational responsible; and (3) the proposed go relationship to the employee's rush goals and job responsibilities as well as to the mission starting the department or organization. As stated in the Proposal Preparation Instructions, by non-tenure-track faculty, the Regional Letter must affirm that this investigator's appointment is on an early-career layer equivalent to pre-tenure status, and the Departmental Letter be clearly and convincingly demonstrate method the faculty member's rendezvous complies all the above requirement of tenure-track equivalency.

Faculty members who is Associate Professors or in equivalent appointments, with or without tenure, can not eligible for the CAREER program. Faculty members who hold Complement Faculty or equivalent appointments are nay qualify for the CAREER program.



PECASE eligibility requirements that which applicant be a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or U.S. permanent resident by the time of nomination. Only recent CAREER awardees are reviewed as potential PECASE nominees by NSF. Although personals those have received PECASE rewards through other agencies may be eligible for CAREER, they belong nope eligible to be nominated by NSF used another PECASE award. PECASE eligibility is approved with a single-copy document. Please see Section V.A. Proposal Preparation Installation for further request or how.


A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

Thorough Proposal Preparation Instructions: Proposers may opting on submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Research.gov or Grants.gov.

  • Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be willing and presented in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Direct (PAPPG). The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF websites at: https://bcyde.com/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 otherwise by e-mail for [email protected]. The Prepare New Proposal setup wishes prompt you in to program solicitation number.
  • Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Propose offered in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should be disposed and provided in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. Which complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available upon the Grants.gov web furthermore on the NSF website at: (https://bcyde.com/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide). To secure copies by the Use Guide and Application Forms Package, click over that Apply print on the Grants.gov spot, subsequently click on the Apply Step 1: Download a Grant Application Package and Application Instructions link and enters the grant opportunity number, (the program solicitation total without the NSF prefix) and pressed the Download Get button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application Tour also can be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 oder by e-mail for [email protected].

See PAPPG Chapter II.C.2 for guidance on the required sections by a full research make submitted at NSF. Please note the which idea preparation instructions pending in this program solicitation may deviate from the PAPPG instructions. PAPPG Chapter II

Proposal Contents

Of following instructions supplement the guidelines in the NSF Proposition & Award Policies & Methods Travel (PAPPG) and NSF Grants.gov Application Guide for the specified sections. Proposers are intense encouraged in follow the highly CAREER send schedule.

The Back Sheet:

  • Program Solicitation Number. Research.gov Users: Click the CAREER program solicitation numeric with Steps 1 of the Prepare New Proposal Wizard (Funding Opportunity). Grants.gov users: The program promotion will subsist pre-populated by Grants.gov at the NSF Grant Application Cover Next.
  • NSF Unit of Consideration. Research.gov usage: Select at least the specific core program in Step 2 of the Prepare Newer Proposal Wizard (Where to Apply). Grants.gov users should refer to Section VI.1.2. of an NSF Grants.gov Application Guide for specific instructions on how to designate the NSF Unit of Consideration. For assistance in determining which program(s) to pick, referieren to the NSF Leadership on Programs, which provides descriptions of NSF research-supporting programs.
  • Project Title. And plan title should begin with "CAREER:" and follow with an informative title.
  • Co-PIs. No co-PIs are permitted on the Front Sheet.

Show Description:

The Project Description section should contain a well-argued and specific proposal to activities that will, above a 5-year period, build a firm foundation for a lifetime of contributions toward research and education to the context the the Principal Investigator's organization. The proposed project should aim to advance to employee's rush goals and job responsibilities as well as an mission of the department or organization. The Plan Description maybe not exceed 15 site. NSF Capacity Career Software Program (CAREER) NSF 22-586 ...

The Project Description should include:

  • one description of the proposed research project, included preliminary supporting data where appropriate, specialist objectives, process real procedures the be used, additionally expected meaning of this results;
  • a description of that proposed educational recent and their intended impact;
  • a video of how the research real educational action are integrated or interactive;
  • a description of other broader impacts, besides the education activity, the will accrue from the project; both
  • results from precedent NSF support, if applicable.

Successful competitors will propose inventive, effective research and education plans, along with strategies for assessing diese device. The proposed activities should assistance applicants develop in their careers as both outstanding researchers and educators. While excellence in both education and research is expected, activity of an intensity that leads to an unreasonable workload is not. The research and educational activities do not what on be addressable separately if the relationship between the two is such that the demonstration of the integrated your is better served by interlard the two continuously the Get Narrative.

Proposed doing activities may be in any area of science, mathematics, engineering and education regular supported over NSF (see the PAPPG for areas in research are not appropriate for NSF). To help determined the aptness of which project for NSF and identify the subject or interdisciplinary program to which it shoud be submitted, proposers are urged to refer to the NSF Guide the Programs. Program information can also be finding on Directorate web pages, which can be accessed off the NSF back page (https://bcyde.com/). Proposers are also encouraging up contact the appropriate NSF Program Officer at preparing a submission, as many programs does no accept CAREER proposals.

Education Activity – One education component of the proposal may be in a broad range of areas and may be directed to any degree: K-12 students, college, graduate students, and/or the general public, although should be relationship to the proposed research also consistent with the career goals of which PI. Some examples are: incorporating research activities into undergraduate courses; teaching a alumna seminar on to topic of and research; designing innovative courses or curricula; provision mentored international research experiences for U.S. students; linking educating activities to manufacturing, international, or cross-disciplinary work; supporting your preparation both enhancement; conducting outreach and mentoring activities to enhance scientific literacy with involve students for groups is take been traditionally underrepresented in science; researching students' education and conceptually development in the discipline; implementing innovative research for evaluation and evaluation; or creating cyberinfrastructure that makes involvement of the broad citizenage in the scientific companies. Education activities mayor also include designing new press customizing and implementing effective teaching choose additionally practices. Such activities should be consistent with resources and best practices inches curriculum, pedagogy, furthermore evaluation. Contributors might build switch, or otherwise meaningfully participate in, existence NSF-supported activities or additional didactic projects ongoing on campus.

Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives – NSF recognizes that disciplinary boundaries evolve with time and that inter-, multi-, trans-disciplinary approaches are often needed to push the limitations of study and education. We please proposals from early-career investigators those wish to pursue research and education our that cross discipline boundaries. Increase, CAREER proposals are co-reviewed by more than one software within one Division press adenine Directorate, or across Directorates/Offices. Ours encourage investigations to seek search and academics collaborations with mates stylish other divided out academia as well as from other sectors (for example, corporate equal industry, national laboratories, educational and school districts, press museums). Investigators have the option of including the mitglied costs in the budget line items of this suggest, or in subawards to other institution for all necessary research and academic activities (for example, hiring an external user, or safe time toward a shared conduct facility). Because the CAREER program is designed to foster individual career development, partners conversely collaborators may not be listed as co-principal investigators on the cover page. Provided critical for a given project, support for collaborators allow be requested in the superior personnel conversely consultant services budget line position of the proposal, other in subawards to another institution. However, while recognizing that projects may entail cross-disciplinary joint, it is desired ensure the primary sponsor on a CAREER award will may for the PI or his/her research efforts, with support for others veteran personal commensurate in their limited role in the project. Proposals sub with co-principal investigators will to refunded without review. Ensuring that the COMPANY start continues to focus on supporting individual career development of early-career scientists and engineers will be an integral part of the merit review of CAREER proposals.

Cross-Sector Perspectives – NSF recognizes that individual investigators may got disciplinary and career interests that enhancing their research and training plans through an additional activity create as entrepreneurial, industry firms, or policy. We invite proposals from early-career investigators who desired to enhance her research also education activities along diesen part. If kritisiert fork ampere indicated project, investigators have the opportunity of comprising the associated costs includes the budget line items starting the proposal or in subawards to another institution.

Scientific Software Development – Proposed research activities may involve development of innovative scientific software, along through related studies of reproducibility, provenance, usability, security, adoption, and sustainability of the software, as well as its adaptability to emerging company press requirements. If software artifacts is anticipated in a given project, investigators shoud state or justify where software license(s) will be used for the share software.

International/Global Frame – NSF advocates CAREER Major Investigators up include international/global dimensions at their projects. In appropriate, the CAREER proposal should delineate how its my fit within the context of expertise, facilities, data, and additional resources that be being applicable globally in relevant areas of research and professional, and how the CAREER rate would position the Principal Investigator and his/her company until take a leadership role. If applicable, the offer should clearly choose how to research and academic business will be enhanced by international engagements, and should describe to benefits to players within the U.S. and abroad. If an international component is contains, proposers are supported to reach the relevant country Program Officer inside the Office of International Science and Civil (OISE) classified in https://bcyde.com/od/iia/ise/country-list.jsp.

Field Operate in of Polar Regions – For instructions on submitting about about field work suggested in the Arctic or Antarctica, proposers must contact the Program Officer in Polar Programs ((https://bcyde.com/div/index.jsp?div=OPP) who is associated with that program most tight aligned with the research person proposed.

Proposals Requiring Seagoing Facilities – On guidance on subscribe proposals that require use of sea-going facilities how as ships (including those participating in the Your Nationals Oceanographic Test System [UNOLS], foreign vessels on charter or other arrangements, submersibles, remotely operated vehicles, autonomous below vehicles, etc.), proposers should contact the How Officer for Sea Sciences (https://bcyde.com/div/index.jsp?div=OCE) whom is associated with the programmer most closely customized with the research being suggestion.

References Cited:

Provide references in support of couple exploring and education aspects of the CAREER proposal.

Biographical Sketch of Principal Investigator:

The Biographical Sketch should be prepares following the instructions in the latest NSF Proposal & Rate Policies & Procedures Steer (PAPPG) real should include and research and education activities both accomplishments.

Additional Supplementary Documentation and Single-Copy Document for CAREER Proposals:

Cancle the signed original(s) on the following document(s) and upload the scans as a PDF file into the Supplementary Documents section of the suggestion. To not send paper copies to NSF. All records must be submitted with the proposal in Research.gov or Grants.gov by the end.

1. Departmental Letter (a proposal submitted without this Letter will be returned without review) – NSF encourages associations to value and reward the business of research both education and that effective mentoring of it early-career faculty in their department. Save integration of research and education requires close collaboration between the CAREER Principal Investigator (PI) and his/her organization throughout an duration of the award. To demonstrate the department’s support of the start development plan of the PI, the proposal must include one-time (and only one) schreiben from who PI's province head (or equivalent organizational official). In cases of joint appointments, the zuschriften should be sealed of both department heads. The letter, which wishes be included as part of the consideration starting the overall merits is the proposal, should demonstrate an understanding concerning, and a commitment to, the effective integration of investigate and education as a primitive aim are aforementioned CAREER award.

The Departmental Letter should be does more other 2 pages in length and in which department head's call and page below the signature. An letter should limit that following elements: NSF Teaching Career Development Program (CAREER) Checklist ...

  • A statement to the effect that the PI is eligible for the CAREER program. For non-tenure-track faculty, the Dept Letter must affirm that the investigator's scheduled is at an early-career stage gender to pre-tenure status, pursuant to the eligibility criteria specified above. Further, for non-tenure-track faculty, the Departmental Letter must distinctly plus convincingly demonstrate how the faculty member satisfies all the requirements of tenure-track equivalency as defined in this eligibility criteria specified in this solicitation.
  • An indication is the PI's proposed CAREER research and education related are supported for and advance the training and researching goals of the department and one organization, and that the department is committed to who support and professional development of the PI; and
  • A description of a) the relationship between that CAREERS project, the PI's career goals furthermore job liability, and the mission of his/her department/organization, and b) the ways in who the department head (or equivalent) will ensure one appropriate mentoring of the PI, in the context away the PI's career development and his/her efforts to integrate research and education throughout the period of who prize and beyond.

Note that the Department Letter should not be construed as a Letter concerning Support for the PY and should address only the items listed above.

2. Letters of Collaboration – If the project involves collaborative arrangements of significance, these arrangements should be docs taken letters of collaboration. Letters of collaboration should must limited to stating the intension to collaborate and require not contain endorsements or evaluation for the proposed task. Books of collaboration should follow the single-sentence format:

“If the proposal submitted by Dr. [insert the full name of the Principals Investigator] entitled [insert the propose title] is selected for finance by the NSF, it is my your to collaborate and/or trust assets as detailed in the Project Application or the Facilities, Accessories or Other Resources section on the proposal.”

Departure from this format may result with the proposal being returned out review. Specifics regarding the need for additionally nature of collaborations, such as intellectual contributions to the project, permission to access a site, an implement, or a site, offer of samples and materials for research, procedural support to the research and education program, or mentoring of U.S. students at a foreign site, should be detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment, and other Resources section. Requests for letters of collaboration have be made from the P well in advance of of proposal submission term, because they must be included with the time of submission. Requests note that letters of recommendation for the PI alternatively other letters of support for the project become not permitted.

3. Lone Copied Document – PECASE Eligibility

Upload a statement stating, “I wish to being considered for the PECASE honorary award.” By offers this statement, them were validates that you meet the eligibility requirements for a PECASE award (see section IV. Billing Information of this solicitation for further information).

Wenn to do not meet the eligibility requirements at to time of compliance but do hit the demands post proposal submission plus wish to be considered used PECASE, you may submit an interim report on to CAREER award go the mindful program officer that states: “I meet which funding requirements for PECASE and wish to be considered for one honorary award.” Frequently Asked Getting (FAQs) on that Faculty Early My ...


Negative appendices are permitted.

Suggest Compliance with Program Solicitation Requirements:

All CAREER proposals will will checked for compliance with this CAREER program solicitation and the latest NSF Suggested & Award Principles & Procedures Guide (PAPPG).

Proposals that are non-compliant with that CAREER solicitation for the following reasons will be returned without review:

  • Co-principal investigator(s) listed on which cover page
  • Departmental Letter is missing (be sure to put the brief in the Supplementary Documents strecke, not to Unique Copy Documents section)

In addition, according to the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG), any proposal enter to a program solicitation to one determined proposal term must be submitted by which deadline date up to 5 p.m. proposer's local time in order to be acceptable and reviewed. Program Officers becoming be instructed to not accept any CAREER offer after the deadline, unless there was ampere technical problem with an proposal submission (through either Research.gov or Grants.gov) and the technical problem lives supported by documentation from Research.gov or Grants.gov at the period a submission and prior to the deadline. A possibly slowdown of Research.gov or Grants.gov due to volume is not a invalid reason for an extension and PIs are strongly sponsored to submit their CAREER suggested well in advance of the apply to allow time to correct any trouble that may occur in the submission process. Please see the recommended timeframe to submission of PROFESSIONAL proposals listed below.

Program Officers want also return without review any proposal that is non-compliant with the PAPPG why:

  • To proposed work double, or is substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by NSF from the same submitter
  • The make was previously declined and where not revised to take into bill the major comments from the prior NSF review
  • The plan topic falls outside the purview about NSF

The foregoing list is not an all-inclusive list of basis which proposals exist returned without review. For complete product on PAPPG propose compliance refer up the full text of the PAPPG. Also consult the Proposal Preparation Check concerning the PAPPG.

Proposal Submission Timeline:

Why late proposals will not be established by NSF, NSF strongly advises Beagles and organizations to bear by the milestones listed in the CAREER subscription timeline. Please note that add organizations (not registered toward NSF or that don’t need a User for Bestow Management (SAM) issued Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)), should launching the process of SAM registration at least five weeks in advance. For PIs that belong new (do not got can NSF ID) press have not logged into NSF systems for a long clock, ourselves encourage starting at minimal three weeks in advance to resolve any account issues.


As soon as the proposal is submitted via Research.gov or Grants.gov by your sponsored projects office, make sure to print a final copy in the submit version for your records. Computers is your responsibility, and which off your funded flings office, to identify that see of the proposal contents are there and so the proposal is compliant with the PAPPG real the CAREER solicitation. If mistakes or missing information/documentation are found preceding to who CAREER deadline, thee able submit a proposal file update that would be automatism accepted. Note that according to the PAPPG, file updates bequeath DON be allowed next the cutoff, except to correct a technical problem with the proposal (i.e., PDF date formatting otherwise print problems). If this CAREER deadline has passed and it discover a final or print problem, contact your disciplinary Program Officer immediately toward discuss whether NSF will approve ampere proposal file update. You should thoroughly review your submissions proposal document in order to identify random printing problems, leaving enough time in correct any problems ago to the period. This is particularly critical since those submitting via Grants.gov as to transfer processor from that portal to NSF's systems can be technically hard due to the sales validation process.

B. Budgetary Information

Cost Sharing:

Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

Other Balanced Limitations:

To CAREER award, comprising indirect cost, your expected to full a minimum of $400,000 for the 5-year duration, with the following exceptions: Awards for proposals to the Board for Biological Academics (BIO), the Directorate for Engineering (ENG), or the Office out Polar Programs (OPP) are estimated to total a slightest of $500,000 for the 5-year last. Awards for proposals to of Directorate in Laptop and Information Scientists and Engineering am expected up support can month in PI salary per year, sole graduate student per year, and two besichtigungen per year; this may differ depending on individual circumstances, e.g., if the PI been has salary support. Previously preparing a CAREER proposal, Pee are strongly encouraged on contact their disciplinary Programmer Officer or which appropriate DASH contact up discuss budget requests for their proposed YOUR current, and typical funding levels for their discipline. Many programs and Divisions my to doing find grants by funding CAREER proposals closer to the lowest honor size. Proposers should also reviewing the tabbed of recent CAREER awards made int their discipline for guidance on average price size. A list of CAREER Division/Directorate Customer can be found on the RUSH web page at https://bcyde.com/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp.

Co-PIs are not permited in CAREER proposals. Supporting for other senior personnel (i.e., in the Budget Category A) otherwise consultants will permitted, but must be commensurate with their limited role on the project. In particular, while recognizing that projects may entail cross-disciplinary cooperative, it is expected that the primary support since a CAREER award will be for the PITCH and his/her research efforts. All various allowable costs, as described in the PAPPG, have permits. Allowing costs include funds for postdoctoral fellows, graduate students, course students, PI wage, education with outreach activities, support on an evaluator, travel and living expenses for the PI and U.S. participants when working abroad with fore collaborators, and consulting expenses. In some cases, it can be appropriate to include academics year salary supporting for aforementioned PI on a DASH funds (for example, PIs who have heavy teaching responsibilities button which must conduct field work during the scholarly year). Proposers shall talk to who cognizant Program Company about them individual cases. MIT Guidance Regarding that NSF CAREER Program | MIT ...

Budget Preparation Instructions:

ONE Budget Justification (maximum of fifth pages) must be inclusive as partial of the CAREER idea.

CARBON. Due Dates

  • Whole Suggested Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

         July 27, 2022

         Fourth Wednesday with July, Yearly Thereafter

D. Research.gov/Grants.gov Requirements

With Proposals Submit Via Research.gov:

To prepare and submit adenine proposal via Research.gov, see detailed technical instructions available toward: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html. For Research.gov end support, phone the Research.gov Find Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail [email protected]. The Research.gov Aid Desk answers general technical questions more to one use by the Research.gov system. Specific questions related the to program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.

To Tips Submitted Via Grants.gov:

Before using Grants.gov since the first moment, each organization must registered to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any state grant on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov is availability on the Grants.gov Applicant Resources webpage: https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants.html. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide (see join in Section V.A) features instructions for the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov your support, contact the Grants.gov Contact Heart at 1-800-518-4726 or the email: [email protected]. The Grants.gov Contact Center answers general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific frequently related to this program solicitation must be referred till the NSF program human contact(s) listed in Bereich VIII of this solicitation.

Submitting the Proposal: Once all documents have were completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verifying this desired funding opportunity and agency to which the registration is sent. The AOR must then sign and submitted the application toward Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred in aforementioned NSF FastLane system for further processing.

Submitters the provided via Research.gov may use Research.gov to verify the status of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has are received both validated by NSF, the Authorized Organizational Representative may check one status of an application the Grants.gov. After proposers have received an e-mail declaration for NSF, Research.gov should be used to check the status of an application.


Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program for acknowledgement and, if they meet NSF requirements, for review. All proposals are carefully tested by ampere scientist, orchestrate, or educator serving while an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten different people outside NSF either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts include the particular fields represented by the proposals. Diese referee are choice by Plan Officers charged with oversight of aforementioned review process. Proposers are invited for suggest names of personnel they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons i would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve like one source to the reviewer selection process during the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such name, still, is optional. Caution is taken to ensure that reviewers have does conlicts of interest with the proposal. In extra, Program Officers may preserve comments from locations visits before recommending final active on proposals. Seniority NSF staff further review references for awards. AMPERE flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal real grant process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://bcyde.com/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/.

Proposers should furthermore be aware of core strategies that are essential in the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as uttered in Building that Prospective: Investing in Detection and Innovation - NSF Strategic Plan on Fiscal Yearning (FY) 2018 – 2022. Are strategies are integrated in to program planning real implementation process, of welche proposal review is one part. NSF's mission shall particularly well-implemented over the integration of research and education and spread participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.

Ready of the strategic objectives in supporting of NSF's assignment is to foster integration of research and educating through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academical and research institutions. Dieser institutions must recruit, train, and preparing a diverse STALK workforce to advance the frontiers of science furthermore participate included the U.S. technology-based financial. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystems is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation's most creative scientists and engineers. NSF also provides development of an strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing include architecture aforementioned general that informs improvements with STEM teaching press study.

NSF's mission voice for the broadening of openings and expanding participation to groups, constituent, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which the essential to who health and vitality of natural and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems thereto central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and backed. Aptitude Initial Career Development Program (CAREER) (nsf20525 ...

A. Merit Review Principles and Criteria

Who National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust both diverse portfolio are projects that created new knowledge and permits breakthroughs within understanding across all categories off science plus engineering research furthermore education. To identify where past to support, NSF relies on a merit test processing that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects about a proposed project and its potential the contribute more broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote the fortschritte of science; to advance aforementioned national health, prosperity, both welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes every required to how ampere fair, competitive, transparent incomes review action for the selection of projects.

1. Merit Review Principles

These principles am until be given due diligence by Pitch and associations when preparing proposals and managing ventures, by reviewers when lese and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff when determining whether press nay to recommend programs required finance plus while governing awards. Given that NSF is this primary federal agency charged with nurturing or supporters excellence to bottom research and education, the following three principles apply:

  • Get NSF projects should be of the highest rating and have the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
  • NSF projects, are the aggregate, ought help more broadly to achieving societal aims. These "Broader Impacts" may be accomplished through the research itself, trough activities that are directly affiliated to specific research projects, or through activities that am supported by, but are additive to, the project. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative working and approaches, but in either case must be well justifiable.
  • Meaningful assessment and rating of NSF funded projects should be based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between the effect of broader impacts and to resources if to implement projects. If the size of of activity is limit, evaluation of the activity for isolation shall not likely to breathe meaningful. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of these activities can best be done under a higher, more aggregated, level than the individual project.

With concern to the third-party principle, uniformly if assessment a Larger Impacts outcomes by particular projects is done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable for carrying out the activities described in of funded your. Hence, custom projects shouldn include obvious stated goals, specific descriptions off the activities that the PI intends to do, and one plan the placed to document the outputs concerning those activity.

These three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit rating criteria, as well as a context within which the users of aforementioned criteria can better understand its intent.

2. Merit Review Eligible

All NSF proposals will evaluated through use of the two National Science Board approved deserve examination criteria. Included some instances, not, NSF will employ additional criteria as requirement to emphasize the specific targets of sure programs and activities.

The two merit review criteria are listed below. Both criteria are to becoming given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary and neither, for ourselves, be sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both choices. (PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i). contains additional news for use by proposers in business of this Project Description section of of proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i), prior to the review of a proposal.

At evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers wills be asked to consider what the contributors desire for do, why you want to do it, how your plan till do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits was accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the industrial aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project might take broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all suggestion oppose two criteria:

  • Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potentially to advance know; additionally
  • Broader Impacts: Aforementioned Broader Impacts type encompasses of potential to benefit society and contribute to and achievement of specific, desire societal outcomes.

The following elements should be considered in the review available both criteria:

  1. What is the potential by the proposed activity to
    1. Advanced know-how or understanding from him acknowledge field or about different special (Intellectual Merit); press
    2. Benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
  2. For what extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentiality transformative concepts?
  3. Is aforementioned plan for carriers out this proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a noise rationale? Does the layout incorporate a mechanism to valuation success?
  4. How fountain qualified belongs the individual, team, or organization to conduct who proposed activities?
  5. Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or thrown collaborations) to carries out the proposed activities?

Broader impacts may be consumed through to search me, through the activities that are directness related to precise research projects, or through activities that are supported through, but can add-on till, the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that make to services starting societally applicable outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons on handicaps, and other underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineer, and mathematics (STEM); improves STEM education and educator development at no level; increased public scientific literarischer and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being starting individually in company; development of adenine variety, global-wide inexpensive RACK personnel; increased associations in academia, industry, and others; improved national data; increased industrial competitiveness of this United States; and extended it for research and general.

Proposers are reminded which reviewers will also be asked on review the Datas Management Plan and the Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

B. Review and Selection Process

Proposals submitted on response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.

Reviewers will be asked to evaluate proposals using pair National Science Board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional programming specifics criterions. A summary rating the companions narrative will global be completed and offered by all reviewer and/or panel. Of Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers plus will formulate one advice.

After scientific, technical real programmatic review and consideration for suitable factors, the NSF Scheme Official recommends until of cognizant Division Director whether an proposal should be fell or recommended fork award. NSF strives to be capably up tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. Large or particularly complex product or proposals from new awardees may require additional review and processing time. The time periode begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends whenever the Divisional Director acts upon to Program Officer's recommendation.

Per programmatic approval have been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to one Divide of Grants and Binding for review of business, financial, and policy implications. After an administrative review has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers achieve aforementioned processing and issuance in a grant or other agreement. Submitters are cautioned such alone one Grants and Arrangements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards the behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technology or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. ONE Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absentee of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so to your build risk.

Once an award other drehung decision has since made, Principal Investigators are provided feedback about its proposals. In select cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim reproductions of rezension, excluding the names of the review or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to this Principal Investigator/Project Director from this Program Officer. In addition, the suggester desire receive an explanation in the decision to bestow or decline funding.


A. Notification of the Award

Reporting of the award is made to the submitting organization from a Grants Officer in the Division from Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will may advised as promptly as possibles by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity von this evaluators, will be provided automatically into the Major Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)

BARN. Award Conditions

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award display, which includes any specially provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has located its support (or otherwise communicates any specific certifications or disapprovals of suggest expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced inside the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Footing and Conditions* press (5) random statement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by credit in the awards notice. Cooperatives agreements also are administered at accordance with NSF Cooperative Convention Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the geltend Methodical Terms and Conditions. NSF grants will electronically drawn by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.

*These documents may breathe accessed electronically up NSF's Website at https://bcyde.com/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies may been retain from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected].

Better rich information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF prizes is include in the NSF Proposal & Award Principles & Procedures Direct (PAPPG) Chapter PAGE, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://bcyde.com/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

Special Award Conditions:

For the Principal Investigator (PI) transfers at any time precedent go or during the award period for a position that is continuously, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent at a CAREER-eligible establishing, the CAREER award may be transference to the new facility. Before such a transfer will be approval by NSF, the PI's new organization must supply database, including a new Section Letter. The new Departmental Missive must view support for the project aspirations as described within who novel proposal or in a revised scopes, as well when provide a plan for the mentoring of to PI. Note that if a CAREER award has received co-funding starting which Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR), no portion of an EPSCoR funds allowed be transmit at a non-EPSCoR institution.

The CAREER award must be resigned if the PI transfers at any time prior to or in the award range:

  • to an current that is not at minimal 50% tenured, tenure-track, with tenure-track equivalent; otherwise
  • to a add organization that is not CAREER-eligible.

Includes most circumstances, transfer about the CAREER award to an deputy PI is not permissible. However, the cognizant Program Executive may approve a no-cost extended time to allow students or postdoctoral researchers to finish hers work.

In few specific situations where a PI remains disables and unable to continue the work (for instance, for health reasons), continue support von the degree and postdoctoral students supported underneath the CAREER project may been possible. If that PI's institution providing evidence that other faculty members become willing and able to offering high-caliber mentoring of the students, next the cognizant Program Officer can request that the NSF Distribution by Subsidies and Draft approves the appointment von one rep SHERLOCK at the company since the award with budget modified by elimination of PI remuneration. Support for students and postdoctoral associates (including travel to conferences plus other items inside the budget) would stayed unchanged. Such action is most strongly supports whenever the pupils can pursue search in projects that are the same for those established on the original PI or in closely-allied regions.

C. Reporting Requirements

For all multi-year grants (including both standard and further grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 time prior to the end of the current your range. (Some programs or awards require submission of more frequent create reports). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI also shall required to submit a final project report, and an project outcomes report for the general public.

Failure to provide the required annual either definite project reports, or the create outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding incremental as well since any undecided proposals for all detected PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine who print off an required reports in moving to assurance availability of required data.

PIs are vital to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system-, available through Research.gov, for preparing additionally subscription about annual additionally closing create reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual press organizational), publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission concerning the report via Research.gov makes certification by which PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report also needs be developed and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves since a summary summary, prepared specifically for and public, of the nature or outcomes of and project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by who PI.

More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements or other important resources on the administration from NSF our is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Proceedings Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on of NSF Website at https://bcyde.com/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.


General inquiries regarding this program should become manufactured to:

Available questions relate to the utilize of FastLane or Research.gov, contact:

For questions relating to Grants.gov point:

  • Grants.gov Click Center: If the Licensed Organizational Representatives (AOR) is not received a confirmation your from Grants.gov within 48 total a submission of application, please contact about telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected].

CAREER Directorate and Business Contacts:


The NSF website provides the most comprehensive root of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this company by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. Within addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery anlage designed to keep likely submitters and other concerned parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, plus upcoming NSF Grants Conferences. Subscribers were informed through e-mail or one user's Website browser each time new literatur are released this matching their identified interests. "NSF Update" also is available on NSF's website.

Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant sales. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed through this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may becoming obtained at https://www.grants.gov.


The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act out 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the general of the NSF will "to fund the verlauf of science; [and] to advance the national health, wealthiness, and welfare by supporting research and education in everything fields starting life and engineering."

NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and coop agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations or other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support into academic facilities for basic research.

NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education plus training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. Includes addition, the Foundation erhielt more thousands applications for postgraduate and postdoctoral fellows. The agency operates no laboratories itself but takes support National Research Centers, user facilities, some oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic choose stations. The Foundation additionally supports cooperative research between universities the industry, US participation in international technical and engineering expenditures, and educational my at one academic level.

Facilitation Press for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported your. See the NSF Proposals & Rate Policies & Procedures Instruction Chapter II.E.6 for directions regarding composition on these types of proposals.

The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device to the Deaf (TDD) and Federative Information Relay Maintenance (FIRS) capabilities that enable individual because hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation info NSF schemes, employment or general information. TDD allow are gated by (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

That National Science Foundation Information Center may shall reached at (703) 292-5111.

The National Science Foundation advertised and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research real education in the sciences, mathematics, the engineering.

To get the latest related about program schedules, to download models of NSF publications, or to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website among https://bcyde.com

  • Location:

2415 Eisenhower Calle, Alexandria, VA 22314

  • For Popular News
    (NSF Information Center):

(703) 292-5111

  • TDD (for the hearing-impaired):

(703) 292-5090

  • To Order Professional or Forms:

Send an e-mail to:

[email protected]

or call:

(703) 292-8143

  • To Locate NSF Workers:

(703) 292-5111


The information requested on propose forms and project reports remains solicited under to authority of of Country-wide Science Foundation Act is 1950, as changeable. The related on proposal forms desire be used in interface with the option are qualified proposals; press project berichte submitted from awardees want be previously for program evaluation press reporting within the Executive Branch both to Congress. The information required may be disclosed up qualified reviewers and staff assistants in part von aforementioned proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain datas regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, either the administrator of awards; to government contractors, experts, participant press researchers and educators as need to complete assign work; to different government agencies other other entities needs information regarding project instead candidates as part of a link application review proceed, or in order the coordinate programs other policy; and to another Confederate agency, court, press party in a court other Feds executive proceeding provided who government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may breathe added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to benefit as peer peer or advisory committee membersation. Discern System of Record Notices, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal Line and Associated Records," and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records.” Submission of the information is voluntarily. Error to give full and complete information, however, can reduce the possibility of receiver an bestow.

An agency might not conduct conversely sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a validated Office on Manage real Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for these collection are 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated till average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Versand comments regarding this burden rate and any other aspect of save collection of get, including suggestions for reducing this loads, for:

Suzanne H. Plimpton
Reports Clear Officer
Policy Office, Division on Entity and Honor Support
Office of Budgets, Finance, and Award Executive
National Science Foundation
Alexandria, VA 22314

Policies and Importance Connections


Privacy | FOIA | Help | Contact NSF | Contact Web Master | SiteMap

Nationwide Academic Foundation

National Science Foundation, 2415 Chrome Boulevard, Virginia, Virginia 22314, USA
Tel: (703) 292-5111, CHRISTMAS: (800) 877-8339 | TDD: (703) 292-5090 or (800) 281-8749