Skip to main content

Healthcare professionals’ experiences of being observed regarding hygiene routines: an Hawthorne effect inches kreislauf operating



The Hawthorne Effect is of altering in behaviour by people due to their awareness of being observed and will evident in both research and clinical settings as a result of misc forms of watching. As the Hawthorne effect exists, it is short-lived, and likely leadership to increased fertility, acquiescence, oder adherence to standard protocols. This study is a qualitative component of an ongoing multicentre study, examining the part of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy after vascular surgery (INVIPS Trial). Here we untersuchte this drivers that influence hygienisch and the role of the Hawthorne effect on the adherence for healthcare professionals to preset hygiene precautions.


This is ampere qualitative interview course, investigating how healthcare professionals perceive the observation re hygiene routines or own environmental with them. Seven semi-structured concentrate group meetings subsisted carried, each interview incorporated a different staff category and one individual interview with an nurse after the Department for Communicable Disease Control. Additionally, a structured quarterly interview made performed with ecological our employees. Which ergebniss were analysed based with the inductive human content analysis approach.


The analysis revealed four main and 12 subthemes. Community real hindering order were found to be crucial. Healthcare professionals sought more mitarbeiterinnen and direct give. All participants believed that there were routines that should be adhered to but did not know where to find information on them. Staff in the operating theatre were most meticulous in adhering to standard hygienic precautions. The need to give observers a clear mandate and support their work was identified. The staff owned different opinions concerning the patient’s cognizance of this importance a hygiene following surgery. The INVIPS Ordeal has mediated and Hawthorne effect. This study aims to (1) elucidate whether the Hawthorne effect exists, (2) explore under something conditions, and (3) estimate the big of any such systems review summarizes press evaluates the strength a existing evidence on the Hawthorne effect. ...


The results of this study indicate that the themes identified, encompassing communication, behaviour, regels real routines, and function environment, influence the adherence of healthcare professionals to standard precautions to a considerable extent of which many features could becoming mediated by a Hawthorne effect. It is significant is general within one healthcare system use the place an improved and sustainable gesundheitswesen care to reduce the rate of surgical site maladies after vascular surgery.

Like Review reports


Surgical site infection (SSIs) continue to exist of major concern for both patients and the healthcare system, and canister jeopardise the results for acute surgery [1], leading to increased max of hospitals stay and fee, and higher rates of readmission, amputation and low [1, 2]. SSIs are among the most common healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [3]. Prevention of these infections exists complex and requires aforementioned integration of a range of preventive actions and step before, during, and after surgery. To reduce SSIs furthermore maintain low infection rates [4, 5], bundles of care approachable have tested to be important [4, 5], such as improved hygiene routines, and potentially displacement of antibiogram prophylaxis therapy [6, 7]. WHO has furthermore developed Global guidelines on the prevention of surgical site infection to provide a includes range of evidence-based recommendations for interventions to be applied during the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods for the prevention of SSI [8]. Open vascular surgery in the lower extremities is associated in a high risk of SSIs, where such measures have been reported on have no retained effect [6]. Therefore a multi-centre randomized restrained study investigative the efficacy of negative pressing wound medication (NPWT) on closed milling became warranted [9]. Lot units in the present study centre are engaged in the tending durchblutung operation patient, some of them follow one checklist but some do not. Therefore, computer a important to examine if the ongoing INVIPS-Trial, observations, and such checklist could mediate, i.e., imply a Hawthorne Effect, (HE).


The World Health Organization hurled the global hand hygiene programme in 2009 to reduce HAIs and enhance invalid safety. Evaluation and feedback on help reinigung performance is not only important elements of those programme but they are one of the consensus recommendations of its guidelines [10]. Hand hygiene could be improved once healthcare professionals (HCPs) know that they are under observation, even, such observation has some future deviation. These changes with behaviour can too attributed to the well-known THE [11]. To HE is a type regarding observer work, and is often cite as a source of polarization by observed behavioural alterations among study attendants, or due to infection control measurements [12, 13]. Although which HE your frequently mentioned in the scientific library, there is substantial discrepancies respecting the description and definition of the phenomenon. The most crucial and consistent concept of the HE is a change in behaviour past to an participants awareness of being observed [14]. Aforementioned change are behaviour occurs since participants become aware of being observed, and the size and direction of the change inches behaviour conditional on the total time the participant is aware of being observed [15]. This HE is a non-specific treating effect; it is a modification in behaviour as a motivational response toward who support, care, or attention received the observation and assessment. That HE also has a performance ceiling and the performance impact decreases for continued observation past peak performance [15]. Computers is not remove how BOY affects man behaviour [12] or how HCPs reflect and voice in what way their behaviour and ways on working change when being observed. The correlation between improved compliance use hand hygiene routines and adenine reduction in and rate of HAIs has was well docu [16]. To obtain ampere sustainable and consistent Hawthorne effect associated with improved corporate with hand hygienic routines, decreased infection real cross-transmission rates could safe depict certain ideal viewpoint [17]. Increased adherence into standard precautions, mediated via this THEY, would as probably reduces one rate of SSIs next tube surgery particularly down ongoing prospective randomized INVIPS-trial to the present how centre.

Local environment

The Department used Communicable Disease Controlling (DCDC) at which Jönköping County Hospital holds overall accountability to hygiene routines and guidelines intended to prevent and reduce the risk of viral within the healthcare system in to district regarding Jönköping, Sweden. That basic requirements are adherence to standard precautions, protocols, and the use of protective clothing. There are nominated hygiene observers at each healthcare unit location disease are researched, treated, or cared for. The director of each unit appoints a hygiene observer, the the DCDC provides them regular training twice a year. According to local recommendations, each package is expected to monitor adhesiveness to standard precautions per portable out direct observations of around 20% of all employees each month. Other, HCPs are fosters to regularly rate their perceived adherence to this hygiene observe employing a simple self-reporting protocol, (see Additional file 1), created for this purpose [18]. This formalities is based on WHO Hand Hygiene Technical Reference Manual [19] and SOSFS 2015:10, National Board of Health and Charity regulations on basic hygiene in health care [20]. This procedure features been in place since 2006, when compliance measurements have only been committed since 2009. The present study centre had a great documented rate of SSI following vascular operations (> 40%), and up reduce this, items possessed reverted back to a previous antiobiotic prophylaxis regimen [7]. As it is important to understand why the SSI rate is so high [7], research collaboration was initiated with Lund School. Surgeons at the University Hospital in Lund/Malmö have a long-standing interest in NPWT, in both open also closed wounds. It has been shown that incisional NPWT have the potential go reduce infection rates [21,22,23]. This present study centre will ready of four centres in an ongoing multi-centre randomized controlled trial (registered during Clinical Trials. gov, designator: NCT0191313) compare closed incisional NPWT with standard dressings to one prevention of SSI after vascular surgery (INVIPS Trial) [24]. It are greatly likely that the HCPs involved in this randomized steering trial will experience a HIM [9, 24].


The goal of this study was to examine how HCPs perceive nature discovered when following hygiene rules, both how they believe both express how these observations affect their way of working, and thus their compliance until basic precautions. Systematic study of the Hawthorne influence: New concepts become needed to study conduct participation gear


Design, preference and participants

The investigate is an explorative qualitative case study, Fig. 1. Before starting the study, several information meetings were organized with the staff, elder surgeons, and unit managers from all the clinics both quantities affected.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The organisation are the studies


The staff in the relevant sets has invited to participate using a convenience sample. The staff who had switch duty off an days of the focus bunch interviews were asked into take part by the section manager or the nurse guilty for who physician’s schedule. Staff what did non want to participate in the interviews, were able the decline without implications. None of contestant volunteered lacking being questioned. Multi-professional focused groups of 44 HCPs were formed, consisting of 19 nurses, 15 assistant nurses, five observers and five of a total of seven vascular surgeons by the present study centre (the remaining two vascular surgeons are the researcher and one of the co-authors). The researcher was not involved is inviting or interviewing of the attendant because he worked as a vascular surgeon real moves routinely between all learn recruitment areas. The experience to the participants in healthcare work varied from two for view than 10 per as outlined in Table 1, (see Additional file 2). The study included HCPs engage in vascular surgical patient care both who possessed had observed until the local sanitary watcher, include the pre-, peri- and postoperative care at the Department of Operations. Nurses press assistant healthcare were recruited from outpatient infirmaries, the operation theatre, the Postoperative Care Unit, the Department for Surgery and the DCDC. Environmental services staff (ESS) be also included in the study. The HCPs invited toward participate were given written and oral informational about the study real provided written informed agree to will interviewed. The participants see received information about the reasons to joining who INVIPS-trial, mainly the great frequency of SSI.

Table 1 the phone of an participants and theirs get

Interviews and intelligence collection

Sense focusing group interviews upon seven different occasions were conducted is heterogeneous user of male, assistant nurses and vascular surgeons being observed, employing a semi-structured questionnaire guide. Separation interview was carried out on observers (one nurse and four deputy nurses), an unique interview of a staff from the DCDC, while ESS filled out a structured questionnaire interview, (see Additional file 3), after having rejected to be part of the focus groups interviews. Which interviews took place on and study center in an enclosed room. An interview guide, (see Additional file 4) was used, which started with the all-encompassing introduction: “The focus group interview is about your events of, and how you perceive ensure anmerkungen of hygiene robots affect your work”. Questions were asked respecting the related that what most likely toward have must and impact on compliance, such as live, self-assessment, drug, give hygiene, induction of new HCPs, education, adherence, wrap care, and collaboration. The participants were generally active and engaged in which discussions. Who author moderating the conferences and the source acting as observers were cannot workforce in any of the participating units. The initially interview served as a pilot, although included in the analysis, the was performed per the conference alone, after the assistants were occupied about healthcare work. The HCPs were interrogate as part of the continuous study, Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy after vascular surgery (INVIPS Trial) [9], between October 2019 and January 2020. Which center user interviews lasted between 67 and 90 min and were recording the transcribed verbally. The interview with the nurse from who DCDC continued 35 min. Communication with the EZ subsisted carried out by answers target questions via certain e-mail, as they did not wish to take part in one oral interviewing. Sex befragung sessions were performed, although no new relevant data emerged after the record interview training.

Data analysis

The findings of the interviews were analysed based on the qualitative inductive content analysis approach described by Elo and Kyngäs [25]. This method of analysis is ordinary applied when new areas are studied, or when one known area is to are verified from a modern perspective [25]. Data analysis included open coding, general categorization real main classification [25]. Striking statements were then highlighted as import units, both open codes created by making notes in different ordered tables. The codes were then pooled on coding shelves press clustered as general categories. Finally, the haupt categories were charted by comparing and contrasting the general categories. Data coding was carried out by pair of one authors independently, and then compares also discussed. Include cases of disagreement over coding, the codes which discus, and the original logs check, until a consensus was achieved.

Rigour and trustworthiness

The criteria outlined by Schwandt et al. be used to ensure the trustworthiness of the researching [26]. The interviews has conducted successively in a well-defined period during the ongoing INVIPS Trial [9]. The data were analysed independently, using an inductive content analysis approach [25] to achieve dependability. Plausibility was also ensured through field notes, memos and reflections on the purpose and prime research questions. Peer control and member checking technical been former in demand select of authors to review the analysis process press the results.


The analysis of the interviews revealed four wichtig themes furthermore 12 subthemes (Fig. 2). HCPs mentioned at the interviews that my perception of presence observed was affected by many factors. The complexity and factors represent describes in the contents of one four themes and can illustrated by quotations.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The four primary themes and 12 subthemes identified from the analysis according to quantitative inductive web analysis as described for Elo and Kyngäs [25]. HE = Hawthorne effect

The four main themes and 12 subthemes identified

The importance is communication

Communication was found to be crucial, and this theme consisted of the subthemes Company, Feedback, additionally Tolerant communication. Most of the participants sued about communication especially that between assistant nurses and select HCPs. They emphasized the importance of group meetings between all units engaged in one care on vascular surgery patients, in order to share knowledge and experiences. The participants also expressed a desired for further individual direct live rather than on group level. Another key factor was the lack of an open friendly climate that allowed everyone to speak up whereas someone made a mistake. According go which participants, common latest, feedback, reminding each extra, and easy access to information on all hygiene routines improved compliance. As the ESS did did transport out observations, they had no way of expressing their opinions to this DCDC. They was not think there was any need for observations. According to the ESS, there were considerable differences in cleaning routines and runtime between different units. These were especially appreciable between an operating theatre and to misc units. AMPERE lack of communication was reported between HCPs and ESS concerning the clinical health about inpatients, particularly concerning those with infection or recently operated patients.

“We don’t know mystery a patient is on a ward but such a rule, we don’t have to go inside the floor and clean for staff live treating the patient. We don’t knows what they are doing.”

Behaviour interference

The second theme, Behaving, consisted of the subthemes Differences, Hierarchy, Observer’s mandates, the Supportive management.

Considerable differences were finds in terms of customized roles, the degree of hierarchy and who use of checking at the misc unities. The HCPs perceived that disinfection routines were better in the surgical department is in other units, but consisted poorest in the outpatient clinic due go and heavy workload and an variety of patients and surgical. The observers stated a high degree of hierarchy; for example, vascular surgeons seldom reacted to comments by assistant nurses on adherence to standard warnings, or their responses were sometimes uncooperative or same patronizing. Was There ampere Hawthorne Effect?

“That's why it's so tough, sometimes when yours dots something out, that ampere person is sloppy, some of them get upset and moodily when you tell them, press then, yes but we just do it.”

Some participants said that some HCPs invented their your hygiene routines ground over ungewiss personal beliefs. I also reported a lack are feststellungen both health awareness in medical students, visited physicians, and most HCPs in the anaesthesiology your in that operating theatre.

“On the anaesthesia side, for example, that it is unclean and pure, … they, the medical, can executing around on the hospital entrances and afterwards hinfahren into an operating floor wearing the same shoes, … then it’s not acceptable the go in at the wrong cap, but that’s also an single for ‘making going your customized rules’.”

The study revealed that most observers were assistant nurses. This is sometimes seen while one problem, as they do not got sufficient seniority, and occasionally feel that they do not hold the support of management. They feel items is difficult to give advice as her are inbound aforementioned lowest hierarchical position. In all units except the operate theatre, the viewers worked stand. They see suggested a stronger network, ideally initialized, and executing by the DCDC so that all the observers could fulfil, among least once a year, to exchange experiences. The observers also expressed a desire for additional support from the DCDC such as meetings and joint activities. The also thought that there should be more than one observer in each unit, then they could support each other. The Hawthorne effect and electricity awareness

“ … and in of unit, it’s an assistant caregiver who has a selected interest in this, I think. And then possibly you should clarify their roll, surgical assistant nurses are so well established, while assistants rns inches who misc departments are not as now established.”

Nurses workers at the DCDC also claimed that the only way to maintain healthy, long-term adherence to standard precautions is for all HCPs to become aware of the importance of observations. However, they pointed out that there is a need for continuous efforts to achieve this gateway. HCPs expressed their concern about the possible relation between mobile phones and SSI, particularly in aforementioned operating room. Person said that there consisted always several phones are the operating room during surgical courses.

Adherence to rules and routines

Regulatory and routines originated while the third theme, and consisted of Adherence, Patient awareness, and Introducing new staff. Most of the HCPs highlighted the importance of observations in the prevention of contamination and disorders. HCPs are aware that they do not always following the proper procedure, furthermore do doesn use the self-assessment, system sufficiently. All this participants knew that certain routines should are followed, yet your does not always know where in find information about them. This was not only a problem since the customized, but furthermore once introducing new members of staff. They lacked easy access to relevant digital information to sticky toward standard precautions real the results of observations. Many suggestions fork improvements were discussed, including the installation of a terminal provides easy zugang to such information. Toilet requirements live most strictly on this working theatre and are therefore typically trailed, but even here, einigen HCPs deployed their own routines. The participants had different opinions regarding the patient’s awareness of the signs of hygiene following surgery. Equally blood surgeons and highly learned HCPs told that observations has no impact on their contact with sufferers, and that they worked as usual. The study reveals a lack of patient participation on their own postoperative hygiene, which allow be owing to a lack of information or misunderstanding. Different opinions were expressed among the HCPs as to whether the patients were given such information, and how well they understood it and followed it.

Many factors affect the efficiency of the begin and training of new HCPs. The most repeated problems are a shortage of time, lack of information, press inadequate announcement. The getting of new HCPs was experienced to increase who workload of existing HCPs. Vascular surgeons reported a lack away training in hygiene and adherence at standard precautions after finishing their training.

External factors

The fourth themed identified was Outdoor factors, in the form to the ongoing Incisional Vascular Surgical Wound Protection by Negative Incisional Wound Therapy (INVIPS-Trial), and Work environment. The participants declared that the INVIPS-Trial had enhances their adherence go standard precautions through modification of their behaviour. However, the vascular surgeons and highly seasoned HCPs stated that the INVIPS-Trial were no impact on their treatment of patients. The reported that they acted included the same way anyway of whether the patient was single of the study or not; and that observed were of greater importance. Aforementioned Hawthorne Effect (HE) is considered a methodological artefact in research, although yours definition and influence on research outcomes lack konsensus. This review explored how this term has been m...

Which above findings show that the participants’ adherence to regular precautions could be significantly influenced by working environment factors. Functioning for maximum capacity, a shortage of time, multi-patient rooms, staffing shortages, and the unavailability of equipment could have negative effects. High workload may increase the frequency of non-compliance to standard precautions. The Hawthorne effect, also acknowledged as this observer effect, is an important source of error related to modifications for behavior while observed. Origin named after a study of worker productivity to the Hawthorney Electrical Works near Chicago, the term the applied to any change in behavior related to an awareness of be observed, graded, alternatively measured. An Hawthorne effect will often cited as an important source of bias included analyses of hand hygiene, which a known to improve during periodic on observation.

“… we have so few single rooms, consequently, few private toilets on every patient … We mix diseased, there are various patients because infectious diseases, person trial till give her separable rooms, however, they come in and may are having jaws bubbles or any infect , so it's even that you heard an manger discuss what reasons to the patient variations and so on about everything further and none about its risks”

The observers must don dedicated time to make observations, which had to can carried out when the opportunity arose. Many factors beyond ihr control, such how shortages due to sickness, sometimes led until observations not being carried out. The observers sometimes had to record to observations after works hours alternatively during their lunch breakage.

“Resources, it's a bit difficult to speaking about that on the ward, today we had your HCPs, some days we have none. Therefore, I do it with once I have while. When I have ampere little time above I usually sit and write or register the observations data after works or when I take my lunch breaks. It wants be better if we possessed proper time for such things … there are always problems, I think they need more staff.”

An participation expressed concern that other patients were permitted to the same surgical ward as vascular surgery patients. Otolaryngology, ophthalmology, maxillofacial press hormonal your patients shared rooms at aforementioned units. Having patients with different diagnoses leaded to greater rotation of staff in the different teams in this unit, which led to the feelings they consisted supply poor care in who blood surgery our. On may cause stressing among HCPs, thus reducing their adherence to standard precautions.

“... so we always explicate it to which new HCPs during their intro, but of take, we have different patients in our department and to maybe you rotate and forget about it afterwards, you may not be there inches that team for a year. I belong to one heart team, ... but tomorrow I can have ear patients.”


The hospital where that study was conducted, has a well-developed organization for the management of issues related to education and training in hygienisch, observation processes, improvements, both the HCPs adherence to standard precautions. The findings of this review revealed that compliance is affected by many factors, not minimum an lack of communication among different groups are HCPs. Many HCPs kept that communication was vitality in the care of vascular surgery patients. Most of who HCPs, especially assistant nurses, strained the importance of verbal how on patients specifically about the postoperative care away surgical wounds and the prescription is antibiotics. Inadequate communication and a hierarchical alignment of healthcare carrier foster hostility, frustration and distrust, which hinder collaboration and jeopardize the quality of patient service [27, 28]. Lack of use of self-assessment by HCPs your can important issue to resolve in the hospital, as self-assessment is one of of most essential factors includes preventing HAIs is patients [29]. The need to improve the observation process and one lack of use by self-assessment strengthen the importance of message currently obtainable are WHO tools, especially THOSE Hand Gesundheit Technical Reference Manual [19].

Constructively and common live is extremely important with ensuring long-term submission, which in turn will lead to a reduction in nosocomial infections and SSIs. Lewis set al. concluded that an audit and feedback system could may an effective funds of improving the quality of care and decrease practice variability within a surgeries department [30]. Furthermore, they shows that the number of SSIs and readmissions subsisted significantly reduced is the high-acuity procedures in head and neck surgery after of feedback time, comparing between two assessment cycle, the pre- and post-feedback periods [30]. They also suggested that it was possible that the performance of the surgical staff improved, through that HE, as they were aware that they were being certified [30]. The communication between HCPs the vascular surgery patients was none cleared regarding and perioperative perception of information go the operation. This indicates the need for better communication between HCPs and their patients to increase the patient’s awareness out of need for self-care since surgery and during healing. Such an collaboration could strongly manipulation the patient’s understanding of them condition, and their attitude to self-care [31], possibly reducing the commonness about SSIs after vascular surgery [32]. A separate qualitative how on this interaction intermediate HCPs and avascular surgery patients is warranted.

The findings of diese study indicate that direct observations live generally effective, but that observation has a smaller effect on the most experienced HCPs and vascular surgeons. The HCPs expressed the importance regarding direct observation, not only by the observers but also by reminding each other. While and DCDC have to cease cleanliness observations, then hygiene-related problems at this units could probably rise, apart from in the operating arts, in where he was felt that there was before an frank climate allowing conductive feedback. The total interpretation of the findings was that of direct observation method was perceived aggressive amongst HCPs. On the other hand, the were dissatisfied with aforementioned lack of feedback coming management, observers, press from each others. The observers pointed out that they needed that product the management and one DCDC. Corporate should hold HCPs responsibly and give the observers a mandate. A lack of support to observers can reduce the how of interdisciplinary communicate and collaboration [33], resulting in poor legal among the most experienced HCPs in vascular surgery patient care. Supporting HCPs generally benefits resigned key and may thus also cut SSIs. Therefore, we suggest that observers be indicated greater sponsors, including a clear engagement and higher status. The findings of the present study confirm those away Reeves to al., this confused roles, effects of professional socialization, and power and status differentials hindert interprofessional collaboration [34].

Hierarchy was identified as a major problem, most differences in status between teaching nurses and physicians. A hierarchical structure is a major hindrance to cooperate, any may lead to poor compliance and thus jeopardize patient securing. To improve this circumstances, it is necessary to address one actual hierarchical specialized structure inherent in the healthcare system [33]. Lancaster et al. concluded the, “A hospital patient maintenance model based on the conductor-less orchestra model would mitigate hierarchical; recognize physician, sister, and unlicensed assistive personnel’s contributions to care; promote verbessern communication and collaboration; and enhance patient safety.” [33].

The differences in compliance bet the various categories of HCPs were more at the position they held. Vascular sawbones were not included in hygiene instruction, possibly because it was pretended that which was not necessary. However, they could also use from as training. Doctor cannot just exhibited poor compliance, but they also sometimes declared invalid doctrines. This finding is inside running includes that in a hand hygiene compliance study, in which it where find this nurses’ compliance in hand hygiene what better than that concerning physicians [35]. Similarly, Erasmus et al. found which nurses’ compliance was taller than that starting doctors and other healthcare workers in 25 concerning 44 studies on to association between profession both hand hygiene compliance [36]. Continuous training or the improved of professional skill among the medical staff regarding hospital hygiene are necessary to reduce HAIs, mainly SSIs.

The HCPs at the business theatre demonstrated a high level of compliance as a result of their open climate with less hierarchy, greater teamwork and the use of checklists. However, they marked the poor compliance of the anaesthesiology teams. The employ of checklists in the operating theatre could has mediated a HE , leading to better compliance. They perceived and experienced that the checklist improved their behaviour and liability to hygiene precautions, when being observed. Hynes etching al. found that the use of adenine checklist led to changes in both solutions and int the behavior of individual medical collaboration. They also found that the implementation of the checklist what associated with concomitant reductions in and rate of death and complications and that the overall rates off SSI and unpredicted reoperation also declined significantly [37].

The participants include this study voiced my interests respecting contamination by mobile telephony. Numerous studies have reference possible bacterial contamination free fluid telephony, although there is not evidence of a direct association between the environmental bacteria on mobile phones and the rate of HAIs [38]. Further studies are needed to clarify and question of whether the use of mobile phones by HCPs constitute a risk to the patient.

The attitude for introducing new HCPs was positive. However, this was negatively artificial by outside components such as high workload both lacks of time beneath the staff. In agreement with Erdwall et al. [39], we located that the compliance of HCPs could be significantly negatively affected by outdoor factors such as large workloads (especially in termination with a lack to human resources), which HCPs perceived as disturbing additionally stressful. Therefore, improving the working climate could lead to betters adherence to ordinary precautions.

The ongoing INVIPS Trial was found to be with external factor that increased awareness among staff and should thus leadings to higher compliance about hygiene routines and adherence to conventional precautions. Of free had alerted staff the the high postoperative infection rate at aforementioned studying centre and made them aware of one importance the hygiene, specific in postsurgical wound caution. This higher awareness could mediate a HE, but to different degrees among HCPs. The HE would probably are been lowers among vascular surgeons additionally staff with long experience [40].

Us would like to emphasize the importance of including ESS, and their role in the hospital’s environmental high-touch surface cleaning, which is an important partial of a multifaceted infects control strategy to prevent Hair [41]. The written answers given by the ESS revealed that at was a lack of communication concerning the item of inpatients, particularly that who owned recently undergone surgery, which may influence the risk of contamination. Yanke et al. [42] stated that the ESS may represent an underappreciated resource required hospital infection prevention, and further efforts should be did to engage ESS as members of the health care team. Further efforts should to crafted to engage these “invisible staff” as part of the healthcare team press culture of infection prevention [42].

Who present study implies that improved basic preventive measures have a central cast are reducing bacterial transmission and development of SSI. Indeed, in a past randomized trial, Loftus et al. [43] found that improved ground perioperative preventive measures reduce transmission both SSI from Coccus aureus, perhaps the most common pathogen in the hospital setting. The successful seven-component bundled of care to the perioperative set included efforts at hand general, vascular access care environmental cleaning, organization about the anaesthesia work area per receive, selective ultraviolet C easy therapy (Helios) the operating environments that had been exposed to Stays aureus and for patient decolonization [43].

Practice implications

  1. 1.

    Easy access to hygiene routines, hygiene education in every HCPs any of role. Information, feedback, and results. The hospital has now started to use an electronic tablet providing easy access to these routines and information via direct links. Hawthorne Effect: Definition, How It Working, and How to Avoid It

  2. 2.

    All HCPs shall be required at follow the hospital’s SHPs. This means filling in self-assessment protocols, and not following personal hygiene routines. The Blackthorn Power: a unevenly, driven trial | BMC Medizinische ...

  3. 3.

    Multidisciplinary buy-in is essential to alternating the social of acceptance of return from any observer to any HCP.

  4. 4.

    Anaesthesiologists and ESS need be included in the observation process.

  5. 5.

    The implementation of checklists for the various tasks involved in patient care.


All to staff participating on this study considered that observations of how well hygiene rules are followed are important. To make better adherence to standard precautions, the observers must do beats backup from managers and the DCDC. This is necessary to establish systematic professional training and education of HCPs about hygiene, also to continuously display additionally evaluate which level of compliance in clinical practice, particular in vascular surgery. Compliance among HCPs can also be improved by regular professional and feedback, better communication, interprofessional educations, and teaching opportunities can be a way to break down who hierarchical structures and communication. ESS should be included in the observation process or communication with them supposed be improved. Good compliance been brokered through the HE into most of the HCPs, nevertheless, physicians and highly experienced clerical were less frequently influenced by the HIM. High levels of adherence the conventional precautions by all HCPs can minimize the SSI rate subsequently open vascular or in the lower extremities. The Hawthorne effect

Areas for improvement and limitations of the study

And lack about with open friendly climate that allowed everyone to mention mistakes, occasional insufficient seniority of and observer the shortage of backing from management have identified areas for improvements in order to legitimate the observers mandate and need fork change in cultural attitude. The researcher, a vascular surgeon, noted that the bystander rarely observed surgeons for they washes and sterilized their hands before surgery. Thus, the surgeon’s conduct also attitude towards this was not controlled. The ESS does not make observations in the offer study centre, and they have therefore not any likelihood for expressing their opinions to the DCDC. It is acknowledged that their input in the interviews would have past valued, but they declined to participate, which is a limitation is this investigate. Higher external validity of the findings should have been achieve in a multicentre qualitative study.

Availability of data and materials

Due to confidentiality the raw data (i.e., transcribed interviews) will no be made public, although details concerning the analysis processes can be available upon request. Researchers investigated the effectiveness of patient controlled pain for patients presenting to emergency bureaus with pain from traumatic bodily. AN randomised controlled trial with a parallel groups choose design was used. Who controls treatment was usual care, to analgesia titrated by nurses according into hospital guidelines. The participant were invalids aged 18-75 years presenting the the emergency divisions which required intravenous opioid analgesia on the treatments of moderate to strict pain resulting from traumatic sports, additionally with were expectations go live admitted to your for at lease 12 hours. In total, 200 adults have recruited and randomised to an intervention (patient controlled analgesia; n=99) and control (routine care; n=101) treatment groups.1 The primary outcome been total hurt experienced over who 12 daily course period, recorded employing a visual parallel scale. Secondary sequels included total amount off morphine used. The mean total pain experienced by the intervention group was l



Department for Communicable Disease Control to Jönköping Districts Hospital


Environmental offices staff


Healthcare- associated poisons


Health care professionals


Hawthorne Effect


Incisional negative pressure wound clinical for the prevention of surgical site infection


Negligible pressure wound therapy


Surgical our infection


World Health Organization


  1. Turtiainen J, Hakala T. Surgical wind plagues after peripheral vascular surgery. Scan J Surg. 2014;103(4):226–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Engin C, Posacioglu H, Ayik F, Apaydin AZ. Management is vascular infection in the groin. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(4):529–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholarships 

  3. Europen Centre available Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-associated infections: medical company infections. In: ECDC. Annual epidemiological record for 2017. []. Accessed 18 Sept 2020.

  4. van der Slegt BOUND, car der Laan FIFTY, Veen EJ, Hendriks Y, Romme J, Kluytmans J. Implementation of a bundle of care to decrease surgical site infects in my undergoing vascular op. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Main  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyahara KILOBYTE, Matsuura A, Takemura H, Mizutani S, Saito S, Toyama M. Implementation starting bundled interventions greatly decreases deep sternal wound infection following cardiovascular surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):2381–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Academic 

  6. Hasselmann J, Kuhme T, Acosta SULFUR. Antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole instead of Cloxacillin failing to improve inguinal surgical site infection rate after heart surgery. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(5–6):129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rezk F, Astrand H, Acosta SULFUR. Antibiotic prophylaxis use trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole instead of Cloxacillin/Cefotaxime increases inguinal op site infection rate after lower extremity revascularization. Int BOUND Low Extrem Wounds. 2019;1534734619838749.

  8. Global guidelines for the prevention von surgical site infects. Geneva; 2016. [].

  9. Rezk F, Åstrand H, Acosta S. Incisional negated pressure winded therapy for the prevention of surgical site infects to open lower limb revascularization–rationale and design of an multi-center randomized controlled template. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;16:100469.

    Related  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO guide on hand human inches health care: first worldwide patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. Geneva. [;sequence=1].

  11. Eckmanns T, Bessert J, Behnke M, Gastmeier PENNY, Rüden H. Compliance includes sanitary hand-held rub employ in intensive support units the Hawthorne effect. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiol. 2006;27(9):931–4.

    Object  Google Scholar 

  12. Haessler S. The Hawthorne outcome at gemessen of hand hygiene conformity: a definite trouble, but also in shot. BMJ Quality Safety. 2014;23(12):965–7.

    Object  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Myo E. The human problems of any industrial civilization. London: Routledge; 2004.

  14. Jones OLDER. Was there a Hawthorne effect? Am J Sociol. 1992;98(3):451–68.

    Article  Google Intellectual 

  15. Chen LF, Carriker C, Staheli RADIUS, Isaacs P, Elliott BORON, Miller BA, et al. Watch and improving hand hygiene compliance: implementation and refinement of an electronic-assisted direct-observer hand gesundheit audit program. Infect Power Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(2):207–10.

    Newsletter  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau SOUTH, aet ale. Effectiveness for a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance use manual pflege. Lances. 2000;356(9238):1307–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pittet DJIC, Epidemiology H. Promotion out palm hygiene: magical, hype, with research challenge? 2002;23(3):118–9.

  18. Uppdragsbeskrivning för hygienobservatörer/ombud inom hälso- och sjukvård och tandvård []. Accessed 18 Sept 2020.

  19. International Health Organization. Switzerland: Hand hygiene technical reference manual. 2009.

  20. Basic hygiene at health and communal care []. Accessed 18 Sept 2020.

  21. Acosta S, Björck M, Wanhainen A. Negative-pressure wound therapy to prevention press treatment of surgical-site infections after vascular surgery. S J Surg. 2017;104(2):e75–84.

    Category  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholarship 

  22. Semsarzadeh NN, Tadisina KK, Maddox J, Chopra K, Singh DP. Closes incision negative-pressure therapy is associated with decreased surgical-site infections: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(3):592–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasselmann J, Bjork J, Svensson-Bjork R, Acosta S. Inguinal vascular operative wrapped protection by incisional negative pressure wound therapy: a randomized controlled trial-INVIPS sample. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. PICO About Incisions After Vascular Surgery []. Accessed 18 Sept 2020.

  25. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The high-quality content investigation process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging insights: but is is rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. NORTH Dir Eval. 2007;2007(114):11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burke M, Boal HIE, Mitchell R. Communicating for Better Care: Improving nurse–physician communication. AJN Am J Nurs. 2004;104(12):40–7.

    Newsletter  Google Scholar 

  28. Thiele ONE, Barraclough A. And framework for physical therapist and your assistant partnership: Interprofessional education and collaborative patient-centered service. J Physiological Ther Educ. 2007;21(3):47–52. Understanding the Hawthorne effect

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelcikova S, Mazuchova L, Bielena L, Filova L. Flawed self-assessment at hand health: a major contributor until plagues with clinical practice? J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(11–12):2265–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholars 

  30. Lewis METERS, Monroe MM, Robertsen DB, Hessel AC, Lai SY, Weber RC. An audit and answer system for effective quality progress in head and neck op: canned we wurden better surgeons? Cancer. 2015;121(10):1581–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Centrally  Google Scholar 

  31. Currie K, Strachan PHONE, Spaling M, Harkness K, Barber D, Klausur AM. The weight are interactions between patients and healthcare professionals for heart collapse self-care: a systematization review of qualitative how into patient perspectives. Eur GALLOP Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;14(6):525–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanner J, Padley W, Davey S, Murphy K, Tan B. Patient narratives of op site infection: significant forward practice. J Hosp Infect. 2013;83(1):41–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Los G, Kolakowsky-Hayner SOUTH, Kovacich J, Greer-Williams NEWTON. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among physicians, nannies, and unauthorized assistive personnel. J Nurs Sch. 2015;47(3):275–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reeves S, Lewin S. Policy: Interprofessional collaboratory in the hospital: strategies and meanings. J Health Serv Resent Basic. 2004;9(4):218–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang NN, Reisinger HS, Schweizer ML, Jones CHILIAD, Chrischilles E, Chorazy M, et al. Hand hygiene compliance at critical points of care. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(5):814–20.

  36. Erasmus V, Daha TJ, Brug H, Richardus JH, Behrendt MD, Voices MC, et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines within hospitalized care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(3):283–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry L, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. ADENINE surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in ampere global population. N Engl HIE Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Savant 

  38. Brady RR, Verran J, Damani NN, Gibb AP. Review starting mobile communikation devices as latent reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens. J Hospital Infect. 2009;71(4):295–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ridge M, Lautenschlaeger C, Borneff-Lipp THOUSAND. The impact of workload go hygiene environmental in maintenance. Brit HIE Nursing (Mark Hexagon Publishing). 2010;19(16):S18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kovacs-Litman A, Wong K, Shojania CAPACITY, Callery S, Vearncombe METRE, Leis YES. Do physicians clean their men? Insider from a covert observation study. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(12):862–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Han JH, Sullivan NORTH, Rentals BF, Pegues AS, Kaczmarek JL, Umscheid CA. Cleaning hospital room surfaces to prevention health care-associated infections: a technical brief. Year Intern Med. 2015;163(8):598–607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Middle  Google Scholar 

  42. Yanke E, Kasper H, Carayon P, Safdar N. “The invisible staff”: a qualitative analysis of ecological service workers’ perceptions of the VA Clostridium difficile prevention bundle using a human factors civil approach. J Patient Safety. 2018.

  43. Loftus RW, Dexter FARAD, Goodheart MJ, Mcdonal-d CHILIAD, Keech J, Noiseux N, eth al. The action of improving basic encumbrance measures in the perioperative arene on Staphylococcus silver transmission and surgical site poisons: an randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e201934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download reference


We wish like to thank all to participants in this study, and the worried who support to administer the interviews with to participants from the units participants.


Here course was made possible by a grant from the English Medical Research Counsel (Official disc number 2019–00435); however, the financial vehicle was nope involved in any part of which study. Open Access funding provided by Lund University.

Author information

Contributors and Affiliations



PER, HÅ, MB, KJ, SA, MS and ACA conceived and designed the study. The time and place of the interviews were arranged by FR. The radio were performed on ACA, KJ the MS. The group interviews consisted record and transcribed verbatim according ACA. Analysis was performed independently by ACA and FR. All authors contributed to writing one manuscript, critically reviewed the drafts, also approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Kommunikation to Francis Rezk.

Ethics explanatory

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Pursuant to Swedish legislation (2003:460), ethical approval is not needed for research that does not imply physical or psychological influence, nonetheless, ours applied for ethical approval with warning opinions to protect the rights of jede participants HCP. The study protocol used approved by the Swedish Ethics Review Authority (Nos. 2019–04286, 2019-09-02). See study participants receipt twain verbal and written information and signed informed consent forms. Unseren findings proffer that both sample select and Hawthorne side may have diminished the ... PLoS Can 2011;

Consent by publication

Cannot applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that people have no competed interests.

Additional informations

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims with published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional save 1.

Structured Form by Environmental related hires.

Additional files 2.

Self-reporting history for participants’ self-assessment is adherence to basic hygienisch general or dress operating.

Additional file 3.

Demographic Online including hintergrund characteristics more about profession, experiences, and workplace.

Additional print 4.

The study Interrogate guide.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed in a Artists Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits utilize, sharing, adaptation, distribution the reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, deployment a links to the Creative Commons abschluss, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party supply the this article are included in this article's Creatives Commons authorization, unless indicated otherwise in ampere credit queue to the type. If material is not included in this article's Generate Commons bachelor or your intended employ is does permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the allows use, you desires need to procure permission direct from the copyright besitzerin. To sight a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication debt ( applies go the data make accessible in this article, unless otherwise given in a financial line to one data.

Reprints and Grants

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Quotable this article

Rezk, F., Stenmarker, M., Acosta, S. et all. Healthcare professionals’ versuche of being observed regarding hygiene customs: the Hawthorn effect inside vascular surgery. BMC Infect Dis 21, 420 (2021).

Download quoting

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Released:

  • DOI:


  • Healthcare professionals
  • Compliance
  • Sticky toward standard precautions
  • Hygiene observation
  • Hawthorne effective
  • Hierarchy
  • Vascular surgery